one piece new opening sekai no owari fumetsu no anata e
It is simply not convincing in such a warlike honor-based society, and during these turbulent ages.My bewilderment is summed up by the aforementioned phrase. What on earth is its meaning? If you are not willing to take up arms and be cautious, you may end up enslaved, raped, tortured and/or killed. And this is a fact, no presence or enforcement of any form of international law back then.
What really ticked me off however was the event that kick started the revenge arc: rather than brush aside his morals to defend nail and tooth his own son and kinsmen, Thors resorts to punching and preaching to a bunch of pirates, whose leader is willing to exploit anything and anyone for the sake of his goals.
Everyone could end up dead or worse, if it wasn’t for the leader’s personal morality. The outcome to this clash ends as a disgrace entirely because of the context. It is an insult to my intelligence, and too convenient.
The rest of the arc is about the relationship of Thorfinn and Askeladd, as well the Danish invasion on England, following St. Brice's Day massacre, concluding with a battle for London.
The point of view is focused on the Norsemen, the Anglo-Saxons being treated as either naïve civilians or soldiers ready to die en masse.
^ Hodgkins, Crystalyn (March 3, 2017). "No Game, No Life Zero Anime Film Reveals Teaser Video, Key Visual, 2017 Debut". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on February 13, 2020. Retrieved March 3, 2017. ^ Green, Scott (March 22, 2017). "July Date Spotted For "No Game No Life" Anime Movie". Crunchyroll. Archived from the original on April 5, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2017. ^ Ressler, Karen (May 27, 2017).
[SMALL-TEXT]]