manga animea
jp. February 2, 2016.
Archived from the original on February 5, 2016.
Retrieved February 2, 2016. ^ 漫画「ベルセルク」を長期連載中 三浦建太郎さん死去 (in Japanese). The Asahi Shimbun. Archived from the original on May 4, 2022. Retrieved May 4, 2022. ^ どろろ(下) (in Japanese). The Asahi Shimbun. Archived from the original on June 30, 2021.
Also; seek 8: "Being caught cheating during a game is grounds for an instant loss. " Add on 7: "Conflicts between groups will be conducted by designated representatives with absolute authority. " Now, reasonably NOBODY would cheat since any sad sap could accuse them of such trickery and thereby summon the Holy Jury to investigate. In other words, one might as
well accuse the other of cheating during every turn! It would only be natural. Yet they CHEATED in the show! What fools they are! Now, one may be skeptical with regards to the omniscience of these divine beings. Well, if they don't know any better, then why not accuse your opponent of cheating just for the sake of it? If rule 8 is divine law, then it must be fulfilled. If the representatives don't know that it WASN'T cheating, then they just have to assume that it WAS! Or else, how could rule 8 ever truly be enforced?
Second on my agenda of criticism: they gave up after rule 8! Rule 9
simply states that the other rules exist, as if I couldn't figure that out already. A heckler cries out: "Quite the contrary, it ensures the permanence of the previous rules!" To you I say this: if the god of games believes that the rules should not change, then why would such a god change them in any case? It is merely affirming one's own opinion, that is, I made these rules, and I will tell myself that I will not change these rules (but of course I wont!). Now, here's the real kicker: what rule protects rule 9 from change? I see no such rule. Therefore, I propose an amendment: rule 11: "Rule 9 now says that all the previous rules will change. " Now let's shift our eyes over to rule 10.
Mushoku Tensei fans like to call it the “Grandfather/Mother of isekai”, but I doubt the validity of these claims because several other popular isekai novels had already come out before it, and SAO (talking about the anime here) might not be an isekai, depending on what your definition of isekai is, but that’s the one that started off the boom of what has
basically become a genre now.
Talking about fans, some fans even claim that the people who have issues
with pedophilia, rape, etc and how the anime portrays these in good light, are soft snowflakes. According to them, anyone who thinks these things are actually a problem shouldn’t use their own morals on a show.
As a protagonist, Rudues is agonizing to watch. This holds especially true for the first half of the season, as he seemed to not even care about how creepy some of his actions were. He’s a degenerate in the truest sense of the word, with very little to redeem his character.